Family Law with Riley Bennet & Egloff

Adoption
Among life’s most joyful occasions is to welcome a child into a family. Our attorneys can assist you with the legal process involved in adopting a child, whether it be an independent adoption or through an agency. Where adoption is not an option, our attorneys can also assist with alternatives, including guardianships.

Child Custody and Visitation
As the most precious asset of any marriage, the best interests of the children should be of primary importance in any divorce proceeding. We strive to provide our clients with representation that will not only protect their rights, but also advance their best intentions for their children.

There are multiple options for providing the best arrangement for each child caught in the middle of divorce proceedings, and we are committed to helping our clients find the right child custody solution for their situations.

Divorce
Dealing with divorce can be emotionally and mentally exhausting. Things often get complicted in divorce cases, especially when children are involved.

A divorce can be granted only by a court, upon the filing of a petition for divorce by one of the parties to the marriage. An Indiana court can grant a divorce only if at least one party has been an Indiana resident for six months immediately before the petition is filed. The petition must be filed in the county where one party was a resident for three months immediately before the petition was filed.

Indiana statute identifies four grounds for obtaining a divorce. Of those, the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage is the most commonly-cited. To justify a dissolution on the ground of irretrievable breakdown, the court must be satisfied that the parties can no longer live together because of difficulties so substantial that no reasonable efforts could reconcile them.  It is up to the court to decide whether the divorce should be granted, based upon evidence presented at a hearing.

One critical issue to be resolved in divorce proceedings is the division of marital assets between the parties. It is important that all assets of the marriage be identified and accurately valued as part of the proceedings. In cases where one spouse owns his or her own business, it can be challenging to assign a fair value to that business. Our attorneys are experienced obtaining information and documents necessary to identify all assets of the marriage, and in presenting business valuation expert witnesses in divorce proceedings to assist in protecting our clients’ interests.

Another important question is the payment of costs associated with the divorce proceeding. The court may award costs—including attorney’s fees—to either party in an action for divorce or the dissolution of marriage, but is not required to do so.  In determining a reasonable attorney's fee award, the factors the court may consider include: the resources of the parties and their relative earning abilities, the complexity of the case and the difficulty of the issues involved, and any misconduct by one of the parties resulting in the other party incurring additional fees. However, the trial court is not required to give a reason for its decision to award attorney's fees.

A court may also order one party to pay maintenance to the other party, either in a decree of legal separation or in the final dissolution decree, if one spouse is incapacitated and incapable of supporting himself, or if a spouse is the custodian of a child whose physical or mental incapacity requires the custodian to forgo employment, and the spouse is otherwise unable to support herself. In addition, if one spouse needs additional education and training to find appropriate employment following the divorce, a court may also order rehabilitative maintenance, for a period not to exceed three years.

Are you recently divorced and need to settle things?  If so, don't delay any longer and move on with your life with the help of a family law attorney. Contact Indianapolis family law attorney at Riley Bennet & Egloff, LLP today for your initial consultation with our divorce attorney! http://www.rbelaw.com/practice-areas/family-law

Jackson trial lawyers

The Law Offices of Robert W. Jackson is a Cardiff personal injury lawyer and is qualified for fighting in the court on trial. With this experience, your attorney knows what it takes to prepare and present your case in the best light. Insurance companies often bully clients, giving less than they deserve.

Because not all lawyers are trial lawyers, we have advantage fighting for your case to get you the best possible outcome. We are not afraid to speak up when we think an insurance company is not paying their fair value for your case. Regular lawyers would be fine with settling for lesser amounts but our strategy continues to stick with what we believe and that is to get fair compensation for your injuries, whether it may be in settlement or in trial.

With two offices located in Cardiff and Fallbrook, California, clients of San Diego county can conveniently locate our personal injury lawyers. We truly believe that during this time of physical, emotional and financial distress, that our highly qualified lawyers can relieve the stress of our clients.

If you have been involved in an accident, you will need to consult with a personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. Contact our Cardiff personal injury lawyers today. We will ensure that working with a difficult insurance company doesn’t have to be as stressful as it can be. Our proper steps and actions will resolve your issues in no time.

Houston Auto Accident & Insurance Claims Law Firm - The Salazar Law Firm, PLLC

If you've been involved in an auto accident caused by speeding, drunk driving (DWI), unsafe lane changes, following too closely, running red lights & stop signs, reckless truck drivers, or any other cause, the Salazar Law Firm ask you to keep the following in mind: Insurance companies are in the business of making money, not paying policies.  If the insurance company is giving you the run-around, call an attorney today.

If you've been injured in an accident, your claim may be significantly weakened if you don't take the right steps.  Get medical treatment for your pain and injuries as soon as possible.  Insurance companies pay close attention to “lapses in treatment” and whether or not you sought treatment immediately after the accident happened.

The Salazar Law Firm is a Houston based firm that has expertise in defending clients facing auto accidents and insurance claims. Their attorneys understand the physical, emotional, and financial burden an car accident or personal injury can be on an individual and their families. Their goal is to lessen the stress for their clients by managing the complex procedures with insurance companies, medical facilities, and opposing insurance defense lawyers. They have the experience you need and give the attention you deserve. Visit http://www.hurtinhouston.com for more information.

UnitedHealth plans to keep overhaul elements

Insurer UnitedHealth Group Inc. sees some parts of the health care overhaul as sound medicine and plans to keep them regardless of whether the law survives an upcoming Supreme Court ruling.

The nation's largest health insurer said Monday that it will still cover preventive care like immunizations without charging a co-payment, which is the fee usually paid at the doctor's office, and it will continue other popular, initial provisions of the law.

The overhaul, which aims to provide coverage for millions of uninsured people, started unfolding in 2010 after health insurers fought bitterly to block its passage. Challenges to the law from states and other groups opposed to it wound their way through the court system to the Supreme Court, which heard arguments on the law's constitutionality in March.

The court is expected to issue a ruling later this month that could strike down the entire law or parts of it or uphold it.

Despite deep divisions about President Barack Obama's law, UnitedHealth's announcement underscores the staying power of some of its reforms.

Court says illegal immigrants can't have guns

A federal appeals court says illegal immigrants don't have a right to own firearms under the U.S. Constitution.

Emmanuel Huitron-Guizar of Wyoming pleaded guilty to being an illegal immigrant in possession of firearms after his arrest last year. He was ordered held by immigration authorities at the Natrona County Detention Center in Wyoming.

An attorney for Huitron-Guizar appealed the case, saying illegal immigrants are not excluded from possessing firearms like felons and people who are mentally ill, and should have the same rights as U.S. citizens to buy a gun for hunting and protection.

The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver ruled Monday that illegal immigrants have only limited protection under the Constitution.

Huitron-Guizar's attorney, Ronald Pretty of Cheyenne, Wyo., says he plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Congress gets rough treatment at Supreme Court

The Supreme Court left little doubt during last week's marathon arguments over President Barack Obama's health care overhaul that it has scant faith in Congress' ability to get anything done.

The views about Congress underlay questions from justices who appear to be on both sides of the argument over the constitutionality of the law's key provision, the individual insurance requirement, as well as whether the entire law should be thrown out if the mandate is struck down.

The comments were particularly striking from the conservative justices who have called on unelected judges to show deference to the actions of elected officials.

Justice Antonin Scalia, who appeared strongly in favor of striking down the entire law, was the most outspoken in his disdain for the branch of government that several justices can see from their office windows.

"You can't repeal the rest of the act because you're not going to get 60 votes in the Senate to repeal the rest. It's not a matter of enacting a new act. You've got to get 60 votes to repeal it. So the rest of the act is going to be the law," Scalia said, explaining it might be better to throw the whole thing out.

Eugene Family Law Firm - MJM Law Office, P.C.

MJM Law Office, P.C. represents men and women throughout Lane County and surrounding areas in family law cases. Mr. Mizejewski understands the emotional turmoil that can accompany a change in your family dynamics, and he strives to protect your interests. Working in the Eugene, Oregon area, MJM Law Office represents most family law matters including: divorce, child custody, parenting time, child/spousal support, domestic violence, and juvenile dependency and delinquency. Oregon’s divorce laws are codified in Chapter 107 of the Oregon Revised Statutes. Oregon is a no-fault divorce state, which means that the only legal reason required to file a divorce is that you and your spouse cannot get along, and you see no way of settling your problems. The legal term for this is "irreconcilable differences." No evidence of fault or misconduct is required or involved, unless there has been misconduct relating to child custody.

MJM Law Office is an experienced family law firm located in Eugene, Oregon and consistently fight hard for the rights of the victims of family matters and cases. Their attorneys are able to ease one of the most emotionally draining and difficult experiences and ensure that your rights are protected. Let them help you prepare for the future and move on with your life. Visit mjmlawoffice.com for more information.

Federal Law Entitles You to an Accurate Credit Report

The Fair Credit Reporting Act (the FCRA), a federal statute passed in 1970 to regulate the collection and use of consumer credit information, requires consumer reporting agencies (also known as credit reporting agencies or credit bureaus) to maintain the “maximum possible accuracy” of the credit information they collect and use to create consumer reports (also known as credit reports).  When a consumer reporting agency fails to maintain this level of accuracy and errors occur, this federal law gives consumers the right to dispute information in their credit files and, when necessary, bring suit against those agencies and the furnishers of credit information to those agencies, to recover damages for those inaccuracies and errors.

Riley Bennett & Egloff Law combines experience and efficiency in credit reporting law to render their clients high quality legal representation. Their attorneys represents cosumers whose rights have been violated by the credit reporting agencies and runishers of credit information. Having represented a number of parties involved with these kinds of claims in federal court, their work has been acknowledged throughout the Indianapolis area. See www.rbelaw.com.

J. Thomas Archer joins Gallop, Johnson & Neuman L.C.

It's that time again to introduce our readers to an attorney that has caught our eyes. Today our focus is on Mr. Thomas Archer who is located in the beautiful state of Missouri. Read more for background information on his law firm and his goals and commitments for his clients.

J. Thomas Archer, a commercial litigator with more than a decade of national experience representing major hotels, resorts and hospitality industry clients in matters before State and Federal courts and Courts of Appeal, has joined the law firm of Gallop, Johnson & Neuman, L.C. in St. Louis.
As a partner, Mr. Archer is establishing a new Hotels & Hospitality Litigation Practice at the firm based on his expertise in defending claims of fraud, breach of contract, premises liability and many other matters for hospitality industry clients with operations in the U.S. and overseas. The new Hotels & Hospitality Litigation Practice complements the Gaming & Gambling Law Group and other business law practices at Gallop, Johnson & Neuman.
Mr. Archer also focuses his practice in securities litigation, regulatory enforcement proceedings and other complex commercial disputes. He has substantial experience representing clients in defense of financial fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, warranty claims and in defense of Securities & Exchange Commission and Self-Regulatory Organization investigative proceedings. He has tried cases and arbitration proceedings before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the American Arbitration Association.
Thomas J. Campbell, managing partner of Gallop, Johnson & Neuman, said, “Tom Archer is very well known as a veteran litigator in the hospitality industry and in securities litigation enforcement proceedings and complex litigation. His expertise, particularly in the defense of system-sensitive litigation, claims and issues involving international hospitality and entertainment industry clients, adds a new dimension to our firm as we serve new clients. The Hotels & Hospitality Litigation Practice will work with the Gaming & Gambling Law Group and other business law practices at Gallop, Johnson & Neuman in select client matters.”
Mr. Archer was most recently a partner in the Litigation Group at the law firm Holland & Knight, L.L.P. in Washington, D.C. where he represented a major international hospitality organization with branded operations and franchises worldwide. Before then he led the Commercial Litigation Practice in the St. Louis office of Bryan Cave, L.L.P., where he began his career in 1981.
Mr. Archer is admitted to practice in Missouri, Illinois, Maryland and the District of Columbia, and before many U.S. District Courts and Federal and State Courts of Appeal. He earned his J.D. degree from the School of Law at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign after earning an A.B. degree with Highest Distinction, Phi Bata Kappa, at the university. He also teaches annual seminars in securities litigation at the School of Law at Washington University in St. Louis.
Gallop, Johnson & Neuman, L.C., a full service law firm of 80 attorneys, has provided legal services to clients in diverse industries since its founding in 1976 and is one of the largest law firms in St. Louis. The firm serves public corporations; privately-held companies; entrepreneurs and start-up enterprises; individuals and families; trustees and trust beneficiaries; charities; and non-profit entities. The firm is located at 101 South Hanley Road, Suite 1700, in Clayton, Missouri.
For more information, contact Lois A. LaDriere, Director of Marketing,
at 314.615.6000 or visit www.gjn.com.    

Media contact: Jeff Dunlap at 314.993.6925.  

Kious & Rodgers law firm changes name

The Murfreesboro law firm of Kious & Rodgers, PLLC recently announced a change to the firm’s name to recognize the contributions of partners, Jay Barger, Chris Holder and J. D. Kious, to the North Maple Street practice. Kious & Rodgers, PLLC is now Kious, Rodgers, Barger, Holder & Kious, PLLC.
The firm’s founding partners, David W. Kious and John W. Rodgers, started the firm in 1997 with a vision of building the best law firm in Rutherford County. “We believed by delivering high quality legal services at a reasonable price, the firm would grow as its reputation grew, and in time we would need to add partners and associates in response to an increasing and diverse client base,” Rodgers said. “The change in our firm name is a reflection of our firm’s vision for growth and advancement.”
James P. “Jay” Barger joined the firm in 2002, was named a partner in 2006 and is the firm’s family law specialist. G. Christopher Holder joined the firm in 2004 and was named a partner a year ago. He specializes in criminal defense, construction and lien law, and collections. J. D. Kious joined the firm in 2005 and specializes in business law, estate planning and real estate.
“With their assistance, the firm John and I started 12 years ago has been able to fulfill its mission of being a full service law firm for Rutherford County, providing exceptional service through sound legal advice and professional, experienced representation,” David Kious noted. “And by adding Jay, Chris and J.D. to our firm name, we want to recognize their contribution to our firm and make known our comprehensive practice, spanning the full spectrum of today’s legal environment.”
Kious points out that the firm is not looking at restraining its growth anytime soon. “New developments and growth opportunities are on the horizon, and we are poised to take advantage of them.”
The name change is accompanied by a new web site, http://www.murfreesborolawyers.com.

Newport News firm a big donor for Democrats

Newport News law firm Consumer Litigation Associates typically doesn't cut a high political profile.
But in this year's slate of elections, the Peninsula firm is suddenly a major player, donating almost $380,000 primarily to Democratic candidates.
The bulk of the money has gone to partner Robin Abbott, a Democrat running for the House of Delegates. The firm's founder, Len Bennett, is a longtime Democratic donor who supported President Barack Obama, among others. Bennett said he wants to support candidates willing to crack down on consumer fraud.
On the campaign trail, Bennett has been aggressive, even taking to Internet message boards to defend Abbott. In places typically filled with anonymous screeds, Bennett signs his full name and offers links to articles on consumer law.
"It's probably not smart to put our name out there like that," he said. "But I've got to be able to stand behind what I'm posting."
Bennett said he hopes his campaign contributions help free state lawmakers from the financial reliance on major donations from lobbyists and corporations so they can make "the right decisions."
"Maybe it's naive, but we'll see what happens over time," he said.
Abbott's opponent, Newport News Republican Del. Phil Hamilton suggests ulterior motives.
"You've got to kind of wonder what they're after," he said. "What is Consumer Litigation trying to buy?"
So far this year, the firm has donated $379,643 and Bennett has chipped in another $38,800 almost exclusively to Democratic candidates. The sole Republican donation — $5,000 to Newport News Del. G. Glenn Oder — was likely linked to Oder's work against payday lenders and was cut before Democrat Gary West entered the race.
Bennett has donated cash, office space and laptops to Abbott's campaign and reached out to fellow trial lawyers with a pledge that he would match donations to Abbott. According to the Virginia Public Access Project, which tracks campaign spending, nearly two-thirds of Abbott's cash comes from the legal community. Meanwhile, the firm has given generously to Democrats running statewide, cutting large checks to Creigh Deeds, Jody Wagner and Steve Shannon.

Gates Gains While Other Law Firms Suffer

Like most law firms, K&L Gates LLP faces headwinds. The recession has cut demand for many corporate legal services, including work on mergers, real estate and corporate finance. In turn, profits at firms across the country have plummeted, forcing many of them to fire attorneys, freeze salaries and shut offices.
Peter Kalis, chairman of the 1,800-lawyer K&L firm, has felt the pain first hand. He cut costs sharply this year, including firing about 40 attorneys and 200 other staff members.
But the 59-year-old West Virginia native -- a Rhodes Scholar, Yale Law School graduate and clerk for Supreme Court Justice Byron White -- hasn't curtailed his expansion ambitions.
In the last two years, he has overseen mergers with firms in Chicago, North Carolina and Texas, and he has opened offices abroad, including in Singapore, Frankfurt and Dubai. His Pittsburgh law firm now ranks among the nation's largest, with 33 offices around the globe.

And Mr. Kalis shows no signs of slowing down. "Downturns can present extraordinary growth opportunities," he says. "But if you are lost in navel gazing and you don't have your head beams on high looking down the road, you'll miss the opportunities."

Former Sen. Martinez Joining Tampa Law Firm

Mel Martinez's career plans after leaving the Senate appear to be bringing him to Tampa.
The Orlando Republican is joining the offices of DLA Piper as a partner in its Washington and Tampa offices, according to Legal Times.
DLA Piper partner Ignacio Sanchez confirmed the news following a partnership vote. Martinez, who left the Senate earlier this month, starts at the firm on Oct. 1, Legal Times reported.
"When he announced he was going to retire and let the governor appoint someone to finish out the term, I immediately talked to him and said, you really ought to consider looking at our firm. I think you would really do well, and we would love to have you," Sanchez said.
The former senator will be banned from lobbying for two years, though Sanchez said he will be able to advise clients on a range of issues.